top of page
IMG_4458.jpeg

Mature Forum

I decided to add this 'Mature Forum' to my web page as it's becoming very difficult to say what you think on social media. In addition, when I get asked questions about touring and road bikes, including e-road bikes, I have found that if I include 'commercial' data such as unit prices or how costs today compare with an earlier period, my social media contribution won't be published.  So the aim of this Mature Forum is to allow those of us with an opinion relating to the many aspects of mature riding to have our views published or to comment on published views  in a mature fashion

Ankle Fusion Surgery -what's the impact on cycling?

Fusion

In early 2026 I saw two orthopaedic surgeons to discuss my worsening arthritis in my right ankle/foot. I was faced with three options - ignore the problem, have fusion surgery or ankle replacement surgery.  To help me decide I asked what would be the impact on my cycling activities.  It was at this point that I discovered just how little information was available to help me decide which option to pursue.  The surgeons both indicated that replacement, if successful, would allow me too resume riding at the same level as before the surgery.  They also indicated that riding could resume after recovery from fusion surgery.  The first option of ignoring the problem was not realistic as my ankle pain was rapidly getting worse!

​

Replacement is a relatively new procedure world wide and neither surgeon was able to adequately convince me and Mary that the risks associated with problems occurring after the surgery were worth it.  So fusion was the only option for me.  It was at this point that I discovered that there was very little information available about the impact of ankle fusion surgery on physical activities such as cycling, particularly if the rider clipped in to ride as I do.  So began a process of tracking down acquaintances who had been down the same path.  In this regard, my cousin Jennifer and her partner Matt, who had been down the same path a few years earlier, were an invaluable source of information.

 

Matt advised that once my rehabilitation was complete there should be no reason why I could not resume riding and he was correct.  It turned out that fusion operations can differ in the way they are performed and are rehabilitated.  In my case I had to be fully off my feet for six weeks post surgery.  Then I had to have my foot in a moon boot for another six weeks and I started Physiotherapy.  It was at this point that my Physio advised that I could get on my trainer with my moon boot on.  It was a clumsy process but with a little extra concentration to avoid slipping off the pedal mid ride, I fond my starting with relatively flat 5km rides which over the next few weeks build up to 10kms at a time.

​

Finally at the four month mark, I got the all clear to resume wearing shoes instead of the moon boot.  This enabled me to wear my cycling shoes on both feet.  I changed pedals from two sided MTB pedals suitable for mountain bikes shoes to Shimano pedals with a  non clip in flat side on one side and a clip in mechanism on the reverse.   I had been advised that the clip in and out bring is very soft on these pedals and would be the easiest to clip out of with my recovering ankle.  By the end of the fourth month I was back on my Creo road bike and riding with the HOBOS, my vets cycling group.  Into my sixth month I am writing this after returning from a four day ride in Central NSW with the HOBOS during which I completed my second 100km challenge after completing ny first since the operation just two weeks earlier.

 

So what has fusion surgery meant for my physical well being, as well as my cycling? In a nut shell they are both better.  My foot movement downwards when I walk down ramps is limted by the fusion but on level surfaces or climbing I am much improved.  As for cycling, I can clip in and out of the pedals with out any issues, I can pedal like I could before and there are no issues of leaving one foot on the pedal when the other descends at various stops.  Would I recommend it if arthritis in and around your ankle is a problem - yes I would!!!

​

 

The following attached pdf file (E-Bike Policy) is a discussion paper on e-bikes that I prepared and submitted to Pedal Power in August 2025.  Pedal Power is the ACT organisation that represents ordinary bike riders in Canberra and surrounds.  I encourage you to read it and then please let me know through the 'Contact Me' page whether you agree, disagree or think that I have missed something vital?  If you are based anywhere other than Australia I would also encourage to let me know of similarities and differences where you are, plus details of actions that your loc al regulators have made or are contemplating in order to solve problems, real or perceived, associated with e-bikes?

Steve Ryan, August 2025

​

​

​

​

Application is no longer available.

E-Bike Policy Discussion Paper

Ankle Fusion Surgery - what is the impct on cycling?
 

Australia's e-Bike Dilema in 2025

This is a trial to see if its worth the effort and I thought I would start with a discussion about a recent article published by Flow Mountain Bike titled 'Stats With Latz / Legal, Illegal and Everything in Between: Australia's e-Bike Dilemma'.  This article from Phil Latz was published by Flow Mountain Bikes in May 2025 and came to my attention through a Pedal Power ACT Advocates weekly list of bike related articles that I and my fellow advocates might find interesting when we are developing potential cycling policy for Pedal Power.

I'll start off by quoting Phil's opening sentence - ' There is no doubt you've noticed e-Bikes loaded with multiple riders buzzing around your local streets and bike paths, well beyond 25 kph and not even pretending to pedal'. He went on to state that 'These aren't the Bosch, TQ, Yamaha or Shimano equipped e-bikes made by Trek, Merida, Norco, Focus or Canyon (or Specialized) you're likely familiar with that see a 250w max continuous power output and a 25 kph cutoff.  

So what Phil's article focuses on is two issues - first how the Australian Government via the then Assistant Minister to the Deputy Prime Minister, Kevin Hogan from the National Party, in January 2021 removed e-Bikes from the Road Vehicle Standards Act, thus removing the requirement for importers of e-Bikes to provide evidence that the imported bikes meet Australian Standard EN15194.  The second is that in 2023 the NSW Government, against the advice from the Australian bicycle industry and its own Transport Department increased the maximum allowable continuous power rating from 250w to 500w. Fortunately, no other State or Territory has implemented thus change but it does mean that people living outside NSW can buy and have 500w bikes shipped to them from NSW.

The implications for e-bike riders and the general community are immense - I read Phil's article a couple of days after I returned from a visit to family on Sydney's northern beaches where we noticed the e-Bike scenario that he described.  We were staying near a high school and we were amazed at how many young people we saw riding heavy duty e-Bikes with multiple riders on each bike and often no helmets.  Pedalling was not required and the speeds were often well in excess of 25 kph. And to be fair, it's not just students in NSW.  Most major cities in Australia now have food deliveries performed by riders on similar e-Bikes that they must be importing via NSW - they are ridden on roads and paths and the drivers trying to minimise delivery time ride them at great speeds and without apparent regard for other riders, pedestrians or motor vehicles.

Another emerging issue is the reporting on e-battery fires which are becoming more common.  Phil notes in his article that the removal of the standard has lead to cheap and nasty e-Bikes being imported from overseas, often with poor quality electronics.  He states that there have been no reported fires from quality e-battery systems and notes that quality home e-chargers coming with cut out switches that stop batteries charging when they are fully charged. My Specialized and Ryobli lithium battery charging systems certainly do this.  Cheaper battery systems don't have this feature and batteries left to just keep on charging get hotter and hotter and sometimes get so hot they burst into flames. Just one more reason to take control of what e-products are imported in to Australia.

What am I wanting to do about this?  I have proposed to Pedal Power ACT that the organisation needs to get on the front foot and develop  comprehensive e-Bike  policy that can be recommended to the ACT and Commonwealth Governments as a sensible way of promoting an effective e-Bike presence across Australia.  I will be taking this up at the mid July 2025 Advocacy Meeting.  In the meantime I would love the Mature Forum readers to put forward their thoughts on both the issues arising from current e-Bike legislative arrangements and on how you thunk we shouldn't be moving forward to take advantage of the benefits offered by safe and effective e-Bikes?  

For those reading this in locations other than Australia you might be wondering the relevance to your situation.  I would suggest that while the particular standards and regulations might be different for you, the implications may very well be the same.  To date e-bikes seem to have been lumped into a single category with one set of rules (if any exist)  applying whether or not they should be?  I aim to lead the charge in Australia and would certainly welcome feedback on what is happening in other parts of the world. Who knows, a little agitation may be all that is needed to get the regulatory wheels rolling and the implementation of rules and standards that make sense as they are applied to the very diverse world of e-bikes.

Steve Ryan June 2025.



 

© 2024 By TourdeMature.com Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page